Why government allows kids to be hurt @POTUS @realdonaldtrump

banker

Sometimes I lay awake at night and wonder why Monsanto is allowed to poison our kids and submit falsified safety studies to our FDA. I wonder why pharmaceutical companies are allowed to pack the vaccine schedule tight with new shots. I wonder why we have an epidemic of “ADHD” for which the only acceptable answer is to put children on speed. I wonder why our government stands by as 3% of our little boys are diagnosed with autism each year, a quarter of them with brains damaged so badly that they will never speak.

I wonder why we give schools financial incentives when teachers get parents to take kids in for an ADHD diagnosis. I wonder why we have shot programs in schools. I wonder where the messaging that “autism is a gift” came from and why the media runs feel-good stories of kids with autism that work at Starbucks and never mention the kids with autism who wear helmets and diapers. I wonder why our media is a mouthpiece for pharmaceutical press releases that the masses think are news.

I wonder why the CDC refused to let Dr. Bill Thompson rework the MMR study numbers once they caught wind that he was going to show the autism impact was on all children, not just African Americans.

I wonder why the top allergists at university hospitals will admit that vaccines cause anaphylactic food allergies and yet they are forbidden by university policy to research it.

I wonder how debilitating the American people is of financial benefit to anyone, because the severely debilitated kids aren’t paying into income tax or social security.

Who is pulling the strings here? Why isn’t our government looking out for us?

It’s easy enough to say “Pharma runs the US” but that doesn’t answer the question of why this pool of children who are disabled to the point that they are a drain on the economic system aren’t being protected by the government that’s being drained?  Our vaccine schedule has passed the breaking point. Why isn’t the government fighting back, based on the economics alone?

I posed this question to my favorite 100 thinkers the other day and eagerly sifted through their answers. One in particular pointed me to a documentary called The Money Masters, by journalist Bill Still, and I feel like it is the explanation I was looking for. You can watch the documentary here (yes, it’s 3 and ½ hours long) or you can read the summary here. {Interesting tidbit: Wikipedia has deleted the entry describing The Money Masters documentary.}

But I’ll make it easy for you. The answer to who is profiting off of causing disability is: privately owned Central Banks.

Central Banks are different from commercial and retail banks. They tend to make loans to governments, though some are adding retail now. For commercial banks, Central Banks are the banks of last resort to get loans from.

The top 30 most influential Central Banks run the entire world. They run our country through making loans to the government, they (and their affiliate investment banks) run American corporations through buying corporate shares, and they run our universities through their financial service affiliates making multi-million dollar endowments. They write the platforms our political candidates run on.

What makes Central Banks rich? Our wars. Our debts to their retail and commercial affiliates. Our college students getting credit cards on campus. Our sick kids who financially devastate families, causing us to go into debt, and have our homes repossessed. If we can’t fund the Affordable Care Act, no problem. Central Banks will.

The owners of Central Banks make their money through creating misery and chaos for everyone else, lending money to get through it, and charging interest on tragedies. They control the economy of every nation far more than any president ever could.

This makes me feel hopeless. What can the average person do to get the US out from under Central Banks?

The Money Masters documentary begins in 33 AD with an explanation of the very first “money changers.” In Jesus’ time the Palestinian Jewish temples only accepted tax payments in one particular coin; the half shekel. When every male Israelite over the age of 20 from surrounding parts of the world arrived with only their local money, it needed to be exchanged for the Jewish half shekel to pay the tax.  But the money changers had cornered the market on the half shekel and began to charge as much for the exchange that the market would bear. When Jesus saw the money changers in the temple he overturned their tables and physically threw them out.

Why?  Because usury, or charging excess, was forbidden. It has been forbidden in Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, and later, Islam. Eventually texts of every major religion had a reference that is interpreted to mean it is unacceptable to charge excess for a loan. This directive was not being observed by the money changers in Biblical times.

Granted, governments eventually outlawed Jewish people from working in various trades and crafts beginning with the First Crusade, so finance was a natural choice for people who could not work elsewhere. But the temple money changers predated this by over 1,000 years.

{Note—my spouse is of Ashkenazi Jew bloodline so while hating on this piece, my critics are going to have to table any anti-Semitic allegations.}

In reading about the root cause of anti-Semitism in the world I’ve come across three reoccurring explanations:  the refusal of Jews to convert to Christianity, the Jewish belief that they are God’s chosen people, and interest rates charged by Jewish bankers on loans, which dates back to the money changers cornering the market in Biblical times.

Skipping forward 1,660 years, the Bank of England was chartered in 1694. Don’t let the name fool you—the Bank of England was not a government agency. It is the first privately owned Central Bank that was allowed to engage in legal counterfeiting of a national currency for private gain. Central Banks literally print money.  When the government needs to borrow, the Central Bank prints money, secured by tax on citizens, and suddenly the money people previously held is worth a whole lot less. They control inflation. They control interest rates. They control the economy. They determine whether or not you have a job.

In 1743 there was one family that took banking to an unprecedented level of dominance and influence: the Rothschild family. Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew born in Frankfurt, opened a coin counting shop. He created a red shield with a Roman eagle and called his shop Rothschild. He went from loaning money to individuals to loaning money to governments and kings. Later his sons changed the family name from Bauer to Rothschild, and they went on to dominate the major financial centers of the world—and dominate the central banking system.

Allegedly, nearly every Central Bank in the world is owned by the Rothschilds today.

Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who writes the laws.”
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1790

It’s no coincidence that Benjamin Franklin wrote that the real reason for the Revolutionary War stemmed from the English banks prohibiting the colonies from using their own money, and insisting on gold and silver issued by the English bankers, with interest. The first law was passed in 1751, and then a harsher law in 1763.

Franklin wrote about the Revolutionary War, “In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed. The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliament, which has caused in the Colonies hatred of England and the Revolutionary War.”

But what does this have to do with America today? Our economy is set by the Federal Reserve. That sounds like a government-owned agency, right? Power to the people?

Nope. Our Federal Reserve is a privately owned Central Bank. We gave up power over our own money, and our economy, on December 23, 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was passed when only three Senators were in Washington, DC. Again, it is deceptively named, as is every single Central Bank on the planet. It is not Federal and it doesn’t have any reserves. Central Banks are all private banks for the private gain of a select few individuals.

In 1930 the governors of the Bank of England created a bank to be on top of their power pyramid, and it’s a bank that most of us have never heard of—the Bank for International Settlements. It is the bank for all Central Banks. It was open for business in WWII, exchanging looted Nazi gold and today makes tax-free profits in the billions of dollars. No surprise that it wants to build a global financial architecture.

When I first began researching who controls America I looked up who we owe the most of the national debt to. I came across this infographic that says “we owe the most money to ourselves.”  In looking at it, the author meant that the Federal Reserve is part of the Federal Government, and we owed the Reserve $2.1 Trillion in 2013. Someone needs to tell Business Insider that the Federal Reserve is a private bank, definitely not part of the US Federal Government.

For banks, controlling our economy is as simple as buying US bonds with electronic credits whose value is based on nothing. The receiving banks use these worthless credits as reserves, and the receiving banks are allowed to loan out ten times the amount that they have in reserves, even though their credits are based on nothing. This debt is based on an amount that 90% of doesn’t exist, and yet lives, countries and economies are destroyed over it.

This cash influx causes inflation. To reduce the amount of money in the economy, the Fed reverses the process.

No wonder we have problems. Central Banks control every aspect of our economy and your own financial health. They make money through our government depending on their cash, and through creating your own dependence on debt for your survival. They finance both sides of war and finance rebuilding nations. They cause economic crises and finance the bailouts. They control it all—why would our kids matter? We are easier to gain control of in times of despair.

Hell, Swiss Central Bank owns more Facebook stock than Zuckerberg, and we think we can use it to communicate our message? Just six companies like Sony and Disney own almost all media, and guess who owns major pieces of those media companies? Banks.

Why would Central Banks allow pharmaceutical companies to back off from creating havoc in our lives when their affiliate banks own large chunks of the pharmaceutical companies? They wouldn’t. They never will.

The only good news is that while the Federal Reserve is a private bank, the President of the United States appoints the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Halfway through Obama’s second term he gave one of the seats to a former Vice Chairman of Citigroup. Why is that OK?

Remember in last year’s wikileaks that a month before the 2008 election a guy from Citigroup– which ended up being the recipient of the largest bailout in the financial crisis– had already chosen Obama’s key cabinet members? Why is a bank choosing cabinet members? How long was getting a Citigroup guy onto the board of the Federal Reserve in the works?

In a stroke of luck, Donald Trump will have the chance to appoint five of the seven Federal Reserve board members in 2017 and 2018. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve said in a press conference in late 2016 that with Trump’s election, our nation’s Central Bank is “operating under a cloud of uncertainty.” One possible route Trump will take is to dilute the bank’s “independence” and its power over interest rates. Here, we thought pharma and the CDC were our biggest problems.

What if we had a president who ran on a platform of overhauling the Federal Reserve and restoring power to Americans for the first time in over 100 years? Bernie Sanders went on record about the Wall Street banks, saying, “The sad reality is that the Federal Reserve doesn’t regulate Wall Street. Wall Street regulated the Fed.” He also said, “Board positions should include representatives from all walks of life, including labor, consumers, homeowners, urban residents, farmers and small businesses.”

And we all know how his presidential run went—the Democratic National Committee had it in for him from the beginning.

Which begs the question: what big donors does the DNC answer to? The answer is investment firms. Try going down the rabbit hole of who owns investment firms like Blackstone—a multinational private equity firm with $368 billion in assets that is the largest real estate holder in the world, and which was one of the largest donors to the DNC, a major donor to Hillary Clinton, and whose members were on Hillary’s economic advisory team. Blackstone funded another global investment firm “shadowbank” named Blackrock, which has institutional holdings in 10% of Pfizer and 9% of Merck, 8% of Facebook, 8% of Monsanto, and 8% of Disney. It’s the complete circle of political control, pharmaceutical and chemical destruction, choking mainstream media, and inhibiting our ability to talk about it on Facebook.

{While the investment firms hold “institutional ownership” of corporations because they buy stock to manage on behalf of their investors, Blackstone’s donations are said to have come from its members.}

I am officially out of time to wonder about these things but I’m interested in hearing your feedback in the comments.

Advertisements

19 thoughts on “Why government allows kids to be hurt @POTUS @realdonaldtrump

  1. You’ve laid this out so well even I, a financial illiterate, understand it. Thank you. I’m interested to read more. The situation is quite dire and hopeless for those of us not part of the Central Banks. What do we do now? The die seems to be cast at this point.

    Like

  2. As usual, another excellent article. It was obvious that you spent a lot of time gathering all of this info and putting it into a very readable piece of writing. Thank you for doing this for all of us who are willing to listen. I pray that more people will have a love for the truth, unpleasant as these realities are to hear. I was glad to see the link to Bill Stil’s documentary, I think he is a decent guy. I have watched many of his short vids, but I had forgotten about this one and plan to watch it. Keep up the good work.

    Like

  3. re your comment about Bernie Sanders. Bernie may have started with noble intentions. His socialism platform was always suspicious, though. And in The History of Money http://www.xat.org/xat/worldbank.html this certainly supports my concerns:

    “Author Gary Allen gives his explanation:
    “If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth programme, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs.”

    “Communism or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite.”
    Gary Allen, Author”

    After he “lost” the Dem nomination to HRC, rumor had it that Bernie suddenly had the means to buy two expensive homes.

    Like

  4. This is a Myopic point of view. Going back so many years and centuries to blame Jewish people is harmful and can only cause more destruction. It is the Alzheimer’s promoting Aluminum, thimerosal Mercury, cancer promoting Formaldehyde, aborted human fetal cells (Capable of gender-bending) Polysorbate 80 which decimates the blood brain barrier). We need to deal with THESE issues of today without isolating one very small heritage.

    Like

    1. While it may seem like finger-pointing at one group, there are many, many people involved of all backgrounds. This is the source material that Levi is referring to and worth a read: http://www.xat.org/xat/moneyhistory.html It’s not just Jewish people and it’s not all Jewish people so please don’t take it that way.

      Like

    2. shellij: In what way is Levi blaming Jewish people for anything? Are Israeli police who arrest Jewish Israeli criminals anti-semites? Or is all the crime in Israel committed by Palestinian Israelis? It is a fact that most people in every ethnic and religious group in this world are decent, but a subset are not. Nor is Levi really blaming the Rothschild family for being filthy rich. Wouldn’t you take the opportunity to amass great wealth if you had it? Most people would. It is we, or rather our elected politicians, who have allowed the accumulation of vast wealth to be concentrated in few hands. It is essential to know our history in order to understand why so many things are as screwed up as they are, and to help us to figure out how to fix them. And it is true that Jews were treated terribly in Europe for centuries. It is this history that allowed German culture to be imbued with the belief that Jews were inferior during the 1930’s, making it easier to carry out their genocidal destruction. Money-lending was one of the few occupations open to them. The Rothschild family was smart enough to capitalize on it, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that they are Jewish. Bill Gates got filthy rich using sleazy business tactics to sell inferior products. As far as I know, he’s not Jewish.

      Like

  5. Reblogged this on makeyourownhomeblog and commented:
    This a little of the topic of MakeYourOwnHome…but it gets to the essence of the idea of why it is important to be self reliant for when times get tough…the Central Banks can own the pharmaceutical companies, the media, the food industry and everything in between. But if you can feed, clothe and be responsible for your own health care whilst providing your own shelter then they cant hurt you…self reliance is the key to survival!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Can’t wait to read the comments of those calling you a conspiracy theorist, having tin foil hats & more.
    There is out there hours of documentaries about this & more & yet Americans still think is just a conspiracy.

    Last time I checked, (I went to DC on March 31/17) JFK Jr was not formally called to be on charge of the vaccine commission. I still remain hopeful that Trump will do something​. He is right now accomplishing his promises. He is our best & only shot. Chaffetz is running, out he goes with the info he gathered from us.
    Almost all these politicians play games with us.
    You know last year a Senior health adviser from one of my Senators at D.C told me he “has the data given to Posey. Those 10,000 documents” I gave him a break. Called again & he claimed” he was looking at it with 2 epidemiologists” I e-mailed Dr. Andy Wakefield, he gave me an abstract to share I did. After some months I called D.C again and the guy is gone! I talked to his successor who had absolutely no clue about this ” epidemiologists looking into” not Posey’s data from W.Th. Nothing!
    Within days of this exchange, I flew & went to Senate Building to see them for a joint meeting with another senior health adviser from my other Senator. Gave them a presentation linking my son’s vaccineinjury sign & symptoms+ his epigenetics+ pubmeds studies+ biomedical intervention & subsequent before & after results they read the initial diagnosis given only FIVE months after shots, they saw my healed son. (Pretty much recovered) & after 45 minutes they blithely had no questions nor comments.
    SMH. It is ridiculous.
    Americans still think someone care. They haven’t realized yet that nope, they don’t.
    (Sorry for typos. I’m sure I have quite a few)

    Liked by 2 people

  7. We must keep this going, sharing, informing. More exposure, more questions, more public awareness.

    Thanks to the publisher of this article.

    Like

  8. Levi: Thank you for this. I knew some of this already, but you’ve added greatly to public knowledge of the crooks who own the world.

    Like

  9. I would caution those promoting the works of Bill Still and his “The Money Masters” documentary.

    The majority of the information has present is based upon fictional pieces; almost all the quotations used for example are not real and have been dismissed by the respected archives in relation to quotes alleged to be stated by the United States founders; including the popular myth claiming that the Rothschild had took control over the Bank of England in 1815, following the Battle of Waterloo.

    This was Nazi-propaganda originally taken from a 1940 movie, entitled; “The Rothschild’s Shares in Waterloo” this is the main source used by Bill Still, and “The Money Masters” is the main promoter of such nonsense. See the below article; including the section on the fictional, “Mr. Ruthworth.”

    The Enduring Rothschild Myth:
    https://www.mises.ca/the-enduring-rothschild-myth/

    Like

    1. So you’re saying that the Rothschild family does not have trillions of dollars collectively and does not own private banks all over the world? And anyone who says they do must be following Nazi propaganda? Or you’re just here to divert attention?

      Liked by 1 person

  10. “Franklin wrote about the Revolutionary War, “In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed. The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliament, which has caused in the Colonies hatred of England and the Revolutionary War.”

    Do you have source? This sounds like more fictional pieces, presented to the gullible as “history.”

    Like

  11. Not trying to divert topic here… But just wanted to remind you all (or to have you be aware of) that H.R 1313 sponsored by Virginia Foxx from N.C is about getting vaccinated or loosing your job. This bill was introduced on March 2017. It seems that her bill is insignificant. But from experience I can say that sometimes bills are picked up quickly even though are not scheduled to be heard. If her bill is insignificant, is just another intent of Pharma to fullfil its agenda. Which means: “Next time until we get there”

    Like

Try not to be dicks to each other. If your comment didn't come through, it's probably because you said something that caused it to automatically go to the trash.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s