Why government allows kids to be hurt @POTUS @realdonaldtrump

banker

Sometimes I lay awake at night and wonder why Monsanto is allowed to poison our kids and submit falsified safety studies to our FDA. I wonder why pharmaceutical companies are allowed to pack the vaccine schedule tight with new shots. I wonder why we have an epidemic of “ADHD” for which the only acceptable answer is to put children on speed. I wonder why our government stands by as 3% of our little boys are diagnosed with autism each year, a quarter of them with brains damaged so badly that they will never speak.

I wonder why we give schools financial incentives when teachers get parents to take kids in for an ADHD diagnosis. I wonder why we have shot programs in schools. I wonder where the messaging that “autism is a gift” came from and why the media runs feel-good stories of kids with autism that work at Starbucks and never mention the kids with autism who wear helmets and diapers. I wonder why our media is a mouthpiece for pharmaceutical press releases that the masses think are news.

I wonder why the CDC refused to let Dr. Bill Thompson rework the MMR study numbers once they caught wind that he was going to show the autism impact was on all children, not just African Americans.

I wonder why the top allergists at university hospitals will admit that vaccines cause anaphylactic food allergies and yet they are forbidden by university policy to research it.

I wonder how debilitating the American people is of financial benefit to anyone, because the severely debilitated kids aren’t paying into income tax or social security.

Who is pulling the strings here? Why isn’t our government looking out for us?

It’s easy enough to say “Pharma runs the US” but that doesn’t answer the question of why this pool of children who are disabled to the point that they are a drain on the economic system aren’t being protected by the government that’s being drained?  Our vaccine schedule has passed the breaking point. Why isn’t the government fighting back, based on the economics alone?

I posed this question to my favorite 100 thinkers the other day and eagerly sifted through their answers. One in particular pointed me to a documentary called The Money Masters, by journalist Bill Still, and I feel like it is the explanation I was looking for. You can watch the documentary here (yes, it’s 3 and ½ hours long) or you can read the summary here. {Interesting tidbit: Wikipedia has deleted the entry describing The Money Masters documentary.}

But I’ll make it easy for you. The answer to who is profiting off of causing disability is: privately owned Central Banks.

Central Banks are different from commercial and retail banks. They tend to make loans to governments, though some are adding retail now. For commercial banks, Central Banks are the banks of last resort to get loans from.

The top 30 most influential Central Banks run the entire world. They run our country through making loans to the government, they (and their affiliate investment banks) run American corporations through buying corporate shares, and they run our universities through their financial service affiliates making multi-million dollar endowments. They write the platforms our political candidates run on.

What makes Central Banks rich? Our wars. Our debts to their retail and commercial affiliates. Our college students getting credit cards on campus. Our sick kids who financially devastate families, causing us to go into debt, and have our homes repossessed. If we can’t fund the Affordable Care Act, no problem. Central Banks will.

The owners of Central Banks make their money through creating misery and chaos for everyone else, lending money to get through it, and charging interest on tragedies. They control the economy of every nation far more than any president ever could.

This makes me feel hopeless. What can the average person do to get the US out from under Central Banks?

The Money Masters documentary begins in 33 AD with an explanation of the very first “money changers.” In Jesus’ time the Palestinian Jewish temples only accepted tax payments in one particular coin; the half shekel. When every male Israelite over the age of 20 from surrounding parts of the world arrived with only their local money, it needed to be exchanged for the Jewish half shekel to pay the tax.  But the money changers had cornered the market on the half shekel and began to charge as much for the exchange that the market would bear. When Jesus saw the money changers in the temple he overturned their tables and physically threw them out.

Why?  Because usury, or charging excess, was forbidden. It has been forbidden in Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, and later, Islam. Eventually texts of every major religion had a reference that is interpreted to mean it is unacceptable to charge excess for a loan. This directive was not being observed by the money changers in Biblical times.

Granted, governments eventually outlawed Jewish people from working in various trades and crafts beginning with the First Crusade, so finance was a natural choice for people who could not work elsewhere. But the temple money changers predated this by over 1,000 years.

{Note—my spouse is of Ashkenazi Jew bloodline so while hating on this piece, my critics are going to have to table any anti-Semitic allegations.}

In reading about the root cause of anti-Semitism in the world I’ve come across three reoccurring explanations:  the refusal of Jews to convert to Christianity, the Jewish belief that they are God’s chosen people, and interest rates charged by Jewish bankers on loans, which dates back to the money changers cornering the market in Biblical times.

Skipping forward 1,660 years, the Bank of England was chartered in 1694. Don’t let the name fool you—the Bank of England was not a government agency. It is the first privately owned Central Bank that was allowed to engage in legal counterfeiting of a national currency for private gain. Central Banks literally print money.  When the government needs to borrow, the Central Bank prints money, secured by tax on citizens, and suddenly the money people previously held is worth a whole lot less. They control inflation. They control interest rates. They control the economy. They determine whether or not you have a job.

In 1743 there was one family that took banking to an unprecedented level of dominance and influence: the Rothschild family. Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew born in Frankfurt, opened a coin counting shop. He created a red shield with a Roman eagle and called his shop Rothschild. He went from loaning money to individuals to loaning money to governments and kings. Later his sons changed the family name from Bauer to Rothschild, and they went on to dominate the major financial centers of the world—and dominate the central banking system.

Allegedly, nearly every Central Bank in the world is owned by the Rothschilds today.

Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who writes the laws.”
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1790

It’s no coincidence that Benjamin Franklin wrote that the real reason for the Revolutionary War stemmed from the English banks prohibiting the colonies from using their own money, and insisting on gold and silver issued by the English bankers, with interest. The first law was passed in 1751, and then a harsher law in 1763.

Franklin wrote about the Revolutionary War, “In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed. The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliament, which has caused in the Colonies hatred of England and the Revolutionary War.”

But what does this have to do with America today? Our economy is set by the Federal Reserve. That sounds like a government-owned agency, right? Power to the people?

Nope. Our Federal Reserve is a privately owned Central Bank. We gave up power over our own money, and our economy, on December 23, 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was passed when only three Senators were in Washington, DC. Again, it is deceptively named, as is every single Central Bank on the planet. It is not Federal and it doesn’t have any reserves. Central Banks are all private banks for the private gain of a select few individuals.

In 1930 the governors of the Bank of England created a bank to be on top of their power pyramid, and it’s a bank that most of us have never heard of—the Bank for International Settlements. It is the bank for all Central Banks. It was open for business in WWII, exchanging looted Nazi gold and today makes tax-free profits in the billions of dollars. No surprise that it wants to build a global financial architecture.

When I first began researching who controls America I looked up who we owe the most of the national debt to. I came across this infographic that says “we owe the most money to ourselves.”  In looking at it, the author meant that the Federal Reserve is part of the Federal Government, and we owed the Reserve $2.1 Trillion in 2013. Someone needs to tell Business Insider that the Federal Reserve is a private bank, definitely not part of the US Federal Government.

For banks, controlling our economy is as simple as buying US bonds with electronic credits whose value is based on nothing. The receiving banks use these worthless credits as reserves, and the receiving banks are allowed to loan out ten times the amount that they have in reserves, even though their credits are based on nothing. This debt is based on an amount that 90% of doesn’t exist, and yet lives, countries and economies are destroyed over it.

This cash influx causes inflation. To reduce the amount of money in the economy, the Fed reverses the process.

No wonder we have problems. Central Banks control every aspect of our economy and your own financial health. They make money through our government depending on their cash, and through creating your own dependence on debt for your survival. They finance both sides of war and finance rebuilding nations. They cause economic crises and finance the bailouts. They control it all—why would our kids matter? We are easier to gain control of in times of despair.

Hell, Swiss Central Bank owns more Facebook stock than Zuckerberg, and we think we can use it to communicate our message? Just six companies like Sony and Disney own almost all media, and guess who owns major pieces of those media companies? Banks.

Why would Central Banks allow pharmaceutical companies to back off from creating havoc in our lives when their affiliate banks own large chunks of the pharmaceutical companies? They wouldn’t. They never will.

The only good news is that while the Federal Reserve is a private bank, the President of the United States appoints the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Halfway through Obama’s second term he gave one of the seats to a former Vice Chairman of Citigroup. Why is that OK?

Remember in last year’s wikileaks that a month before the 2008 election a guy from Citigroup– which ended up being the recipient of the largest bailout in the financial crisis– had already chosen Obama’s key cabinet members? Why is a bank choosing cabinet members? How long was getting a Citigroup guy onto the board of the Federal Reserve in the works?

In a stroke of luck, Donald Trump will have the chance to appoint five of the seven Federal Reserve board members in 2017 and 2018. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve said in a press conference in late 2016 that with Trump’s election, our nation’s Central Bank is “operating under a cloud of uncertainty.” One possible route Trump will take is to dilute the bank’s “independence” and its power over interest rates. Here, we thought pharma and the CDC were our biggest problems.

What if we had a president who ran on a platform of overhauling the Federal Reserve and restoring power to Americans for the first time in over 100 years? Bernie Sanders went on record about the Wall Street banks, saying, “The sad reality is that the Federal Reserve doesn’t regulate Wall Street. Wall Street regulated the Fed.” He also said, “Board positions should include representatives from all walks of life, including labor, consumers, homeowners, urban residents, farmers and small businesses.”

And we all know how his presidential run went—the Democratic National Committee had it in for him from the beginning.

Which begs the question: what big donors does the DNC answer to? The answer is investment firms. Try going down the rabbit hole of who owns investment firms like Blackstone—a multinational private equity firm with $368 billion in assets that is the largest real estate holder in the world, and which was one of the largest donors to the DNC, a major donor to Hillary Clinton, and whose members were on Hillary’s economic advisory team. Blackstone funded another global investment firm “shadowbank” named Blackrock, which has institutional holdings in 10% of Pfizer and 9% of Merck, 8% of Facebook, 8% of Monsanto, and 8% of Disney. It’s the complete circle of political control, pharmaceutical and chemical destruction, choking mainstream media, and inhibiting our ability to talk about it on Facebook.

{While the investment firms hold “institutional ownership” of corporations because they buy stock to manage on behalf of their investors, Blackstone’s donations are said to have come from its members.}

I am officially out of time to wonder about these things but I’m interested in hearing your feedback in the comments.

Are most kids who die of the flu really unvaccinated @CDCgov?

disbelief

Blazing hot news today! NBC’s favorite pharma whoo-a Maggie Fox has published a story about a new CDC study that claims that “most kids” who die of the flu are unvaccinated.  This really is news to me since I have never– and I mean never, not once– read about a child flu death where the parents weren’t saying, “She had the flu vaccine, why did this happen?”

So, we’re told what?  That 40,000 kids die of the flu every year or some such, right?  Just an outrageous number comprised mostly of 105-year old nursing home patients with pneumonia.

But this study says that in the four years from the summer of 2010 to the summer of 2014, there were just 358 lab confirmed flu deaths in children aged 6 months to 17 years. Losing even one child to illness is a tragic event and I don’t mean to minimize any death when I point out that we are talking about 90 deaths per year in a country with 73 million kids under the age of 17. That’s a 1 in 800,000 statistic.

For whatever reason Maggie Fox linked to a story she wrote herself in 2013 rather than linking to the study, so make sure to click here to read the actual study itself.

Here’s what stood out the most during my reading of it.

Out of the 358 kids who died of the flu, 67 did not have medical records available, so the study is really about 291 kids.

Of these 291 kids who died of the flu, 75 were in the “vaccinated” category while 216 were in the “unvaccinated” category, which means, by CDC standards, 1/4 were vaccinated and 3/4 were not.

You’d assume “unvaccinated” means never vaccinated, right? Or at least never vaccinated for the flu? Nope. It turns out that if a child received the flu vaccine in previous years, but their medical record didn’t mention that season’s flu vaccine, they were automatically deemed to be “unvaccinated” by the CDC.

So if a seven-year old got a flu vaccine at four years old, five years old, and six years old and it’s in their record, but they didn’t get it when they were seven, they are “unvaccinated” for this study. Or, maybe their mom popped into Walgreens for the vaccine when they were seven, or they got the shot at school, and it didn’t make it into the record for whatever reason, they are also “unvaccinated” for the study. The CDC was not looking for “mom refused the flu shot” in the records before labeling a child “unvaccinated.”

Of the 291 kids who died of the flu, 153 were labeled “high risk” children because they had one or many serious underlying conditions such as chronic lung disease, heart disease, kidney or liver disorders, or neurological disorders like brain or spinal cord injuries. Almost 1/3 of these chronically ill children who died were vaccinated.

So now we’re down to talking about 138 kids who weren’t already in and out of the hospital all the time, which is not a very respectable number for a study.

Oh, wait! The authors also included asthmatic kids as “high risk” which sounds like a vaccine marketing ploy despite the 2012 study that discovered that asthmatic kids vaccinated for the flu were THREE TIMES more likely to end up hospitalized. But we don’t know how many of the kids who died had spinal tumors or congenital heart disease versus how many of the kids just had asthma.

Seven deceased vaccinated children were left out of the study because they had received the flu vaccine within two weeks of catching the flu and dying. Rather than considering the flu vaccine’s role in killing the child, the study authors claim that a vaccine given 14 days ago is life-saving while a vaccine given 13 days ago is not.

My takeaway here is that 53% of the 291 children with vaccination records who died of lab-confirmed flu from 2010 to 2014 were probably so seriously ill with a chronic condition that any number of viruses that we don’t sell a vaccine for could have been fatal to them.

And that the “unvaccinated” category of children who passed away may have been vaccinated to the hilt for all we know, but they certainly don’t fit into the public’s understanding of what an unvaccinated child looks like, which would be a child who has never received a vaccine.

Can someone explain #ButIVaccinate to me?

#ButIVaccinate

I stepped away from social media for a few weeks and have no idea what the freaky frack is going on with this stupid hashtag. Is this some mommy war shit? A blatant attempt at straight up mom-shaming?

Like, you are such a horrible mom, please take a moment to reflect on and confess what a terrible parent you are and wallow in it. Are you up to your ears in dirty laundry? Did you miss the first 20 minutes of the school play because your boss wanted you in a meeting? Did you forget about the tooth fairy money two nights in a row?

Never fear! We, the pharmaceutical industry (with assistance from your national health department and our paid mommy bloggers), hereby grant you permission to cut yourself some slack because lady, at least you vaccinated.

Your child exists on mac & cheese but at least you vaccinate? Well no shit, Sherlock. Dairy and gluten acts like a drug in your child. How is a vaccine going to counter that?

Your kid got sent to detention because you forgot to give him his ADHD meds but at least you vaccinate? Are you joking?

You let your toddler walk around all day with an upper lip encrusted with snot and didn’t bother to clean her up but at least you vaccinate? Truly shocking. I wouldn’t have guessed.

Your son spent 12 straight hours on the iPad this weekend but at least you vaccinate? You know what this sounds like, right?

I saw a tweet that read, “At least we get the big things right, like vaccinating.”

Um, no. The big things are giving your child love and attention, healthy food, and plenty of room and freedom to play. Providing an education, clean drinking water, a safe home, and raising them with respect.

I’d also argue that “the big things” include limiting their exposure to endocrine disruptors, preservatives, heavy metals and unnecessary antibiotics, but maybe that’s just me.

How does injecting your child with mercury and aluminum make up for the fact that they’ve eaten nothing but Ritz Bits for the past five days? Did you think you were injecting nutrients?

The biggest parenting fail I can think of is living in ignorant bliss despite the warning bells going off in the media that vaccines are so great they’ve got to be shoved down our throats against our will and anyone who thinks otherwise is a nut case.

The only one getting immunity from vaccines is the pharma industry, but you vaccinate.

I’m going to leave you with the words of Jane Know It All who wrote the greatest poem in the history of poems that sums up how I feel about people who perpetuate pharmaceutical propaganda.

“Just saw another story about suing the unvaxxed.
Friend asked, “When did Americans become such pussies [over measles]?” and I replied, “When their Pharma overlords told them to be.”
Afraid of measles?
you’re an asshole who has never heard of Vit A and proper nutrition –WAIT! I take that back!
YOU morons SHOULD fear measles.
Consider most of these parents who fear the unvax’d think proper nutrition is a fucking HOT POCKET and a Flintstones vitamin.”

But at least you vaccinate.

Update: it looks like the ladies of TMR already investigated this ill founded campaign. Click over and give them a read.

Research confirms what moms already know

measuring-tape

Making mainstream news today: researchers at the University of North Carolina have confirmed in a new study published in Nature this month that yes, Gigantic Autism Forehead does in fact precede autism.

Now there’s something you don’t see everyday…

No, wait. We actually do see it everyday. We see it in our daily lives, we see it in our neighbor’s kids, we see it in the CDC’s own #teamvax photo.

We all know the Gigantic Autism Forehead. They weren’t born with it.

All of our born-normal babies had normal heads with circumference measurements that plot somewhere around the 50th percentile. That means that at the two-month vaccine appointment your baby’s head was clocking in at a normal 40 centimeters.

But then sometime after the 6-month vaccine appointment you might have noticed your child had a slight resemblance to Baby Frankenstein. Rather than growing the usual 2 to 4 centimeters in that time, his head has expanded by 6 or 7 centimeters, and now he’s off the growth chart completely, or hovering just at the 99th percentile so your doc says he’s fine, no cause for worry. But you can’t help but notice this new growth is centered around a bulging forehead.

When the hell did that start? Look back at old photos. If you adhered to the vaccine schedule, you’ll probably notice the bulging forehead beginning at three months old, a few weeks after that first vaccine appointment. Request your child’s records from the ped and see for yourself when the circumference projection began to creep off the line it started on at two months old.

This research team performed brain scans on sleeping high-risk-for-autism babies who already had an autistic sibling and discovered an initial “hyperexpansion” of the outer brain tissue between 6 and 12 months old (coughENCEPHALITIScough, cough).

But what about the brains of kids who were younger? What about kids too young to be vaccinated? They left them out of the study, of course. God forbid we look into kids before they receive three full rounds of the vaccination schedule.

Then it gets worse. Starting at 12 months, the kids with hyperexpansion went on to have measurable “brain volume overgrowth.” Then, sometime after two years old, come the classic symptoms and the autism diagnosis.

In this study, 15 of the 106 high risk infants showed this hyperexpansion before 12 months old, and the researchers predicted they would go on to have brain overgrowth, show autism symptoms, and receive a diagnosis down the road.

And guess what? The prediction was right. With an 81% accuracy rate. Can’t help but wonder if the other 19% quit vaccinating at that point.

The Gigantic Autism Forehead isn’t really news, though. The press has been writing about “autism features” such as the “broad upper face” for five years now, putting the effect before the cause by acting like children are born with autism features.

And that brain overgrowth bit isn’t news either– for the past 18 months it’s been the pro-vaccine favorite autism-is-genetic argument. They say that since autism appears to be caused by having too many synapses in the brain; too many connections, not enough pruning going on, leading to sensory overload and epilepsy– and that autism begins in utero.

But look closely. These researchers just confirmed the brain overgrowth is post-natal, not in the womb. 

Unfortunately, these researchers don’t delve into theories of why in their discussion about the new study. Why are these infant brains swelling? Why are the brains overgrowing? Why has the pruning mechanism been turned off?

The Gigantic Autism Forehead part of it isn’t a mystery– it’s the result of the baby’s skull accommodating both the initial swelling and the later overgrowth. Every enlightened autism mom already knows where the forehead came from.

So naturally the BBC signed off the article in the link above with the declaration, “This pours cold water on the debunked claims that the MMR jab causes autism.”

Wait, what?  The researchers studied children at 6, 12 and 24 months old who most likely already had three rounds of vaccines by 6 months, resulting in the initial brain tissue inflammation. They said that volume overgrowth in those inflamed brains then begins in the 12th month– which is when the MMR is given in the US.

Where is this cold water, BBC?

All I’m seeing is smoke leading to fire.

A trigger finger on a loaded chamber.

One last chance to pull the brakes on a train before it goes off the rails.

The WHO commissioned a 44-page booklet on how to deal with you

karate

Hello, is this thing on?

I’ve been on something of a little brain break. Yes, I got your 1,000 messages telling me to write about RFK Jr. and Trump, but I don’t have any more information about that situation than all of you, and the only interview I’ve seen about it is here.

I was scrolling through my buddy Forrest’s Facebook page (if you don’t follow him, you’re missing out) last night and came across his post about the 44-page World Health Organization’s best practice guide “How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public.”

I didn’t get past the first page before I needed to look up the authors of this masterpiece and read up on Erfurt University’s Mr. Philipp Schmid. Nothing says esteemed professor like Mr. Schmid from Erfurt, right? Surely he must be 70 years old; an expert in his field. I bet he has 16 grandchildren and we can trust him to tell us what’s best for our kids.

But no, it turns out that Mr. Schmid is a research assistant. Like, at his university. And he wrote the 44-page vaccine pusher e-book for the WHO when he was… an intern at their regional office.

he-looks-12

What medical doctor wants the Doogie Howser of pro-vax messaging to advise them on their professional conduct? I don’t care that he’s the president of the debate club at Erfurt.

I can’t even say that sentence out loud without laughing.

The whole point of the document is to teach doctors/pharma/spokespeople to 1) re-educate the masses who are listening to someone who is against vaccines and 2) unmask the techniques the anti-vax speaker is using. Because nothing says, “Gotcha!” like publicly shouting, “Post hoc ergo propter hoc!” to expose our logical fallacies of vaccine injury.

In one breath he says that “vaccine deniers” ignore scientific evidence because they criticize the scientific approach, and in the next breath he says that challenge is the fundamental tenant of scientific progress. Wouldn’t we all love to have the funding to challenge vaccine science?

Maybe he didn’t get the memo that the science is settled? Maybe he hasn’t heard that vaccine safety is “asked and answered?” Maybe he doesn’t know about the vaccination consensus? Because nothing says scientifically proven safety like a bunch of doctors agreeing on it.

Oh wait. His WHO paper says “consensus” 17 times. He does get it.

I can’t believe I suffered through reading this 9th grade level paper.

 

Note to Schmid: when your print-

ed work is laid out to have 158 hy-

phens in it, you should ask your ed-

itor to justify it. This isn’t 1950.

It reads like you wrote it on a type-

writer.

 

In a nutshell, our little friend feels that all of us either reject or misunderstand science, we move the goalposts if we find ourselves getting verbally served by a pro-vaxer, we attack the opposition on a personal level (like this piece, is that what he means?), and that we’re dicks for not letting them leave 1,000 comments an hour on our blogs as if the first amendment applies to trolling. And his advice to the Paul Offits of the world is to go get some media training to be more charming and trustworthy-appearing and not say things like, “Get the fuck out of here” on camera. There. I saved you from reading it.

As Forrest points out in his video (if you haven’t seen it, you need to), the most hilarious part of the Shmid e-book is where he cautions his readers to trust their intuition when it comes to avoiding dangerous situations. Really.

I couldn’t make this shit up. On page 38 this clown–  who was just telling us that peer reviewed science trumps all– is warning his readers to trust their instincts and get out of situations that their guts tell them are dangerous.

But the moms who are blessed with maternal instincts that are screaming at them to get their newborn baby out of the nurse’s hands and hit the road? Naw, screw that instinct. He just means the instinct that tells you you’re about to get your ass kicked on the news by a pissed off parent like J.B. Handley, which is why you’ve never seen Paul Offit appear on television with him.

It turns out that “trust your instinct” isn’t some one-off remark that Mr. Schmid didn’t really mean. See, he’s a ka-rah-tey instructor and he knows that instinct is a matter of life or death. It can mean kill or be killed. Mr. Schmid is so educated on the topic of humans relying on instinct to make decisions that he wrote an entire paper on the intuitive perception of risk. When he tells his readers that they have the right to say no, to put their safety first, and to get out of a bad situation if their instinct tells them to, he means every word of it.

Yet… he doesn’t see the parallels. He doesn’t get the irony.

So, being the science-denier that I am, I’m going to encourage you all to take Mr. Schmid’s advice to heart and trust your instincts when it comes to getting out of dangerous situations. The pediatric medical establishment would not exist but for their ability to strip parents of their instinct while training them up to hand over that kid every two months for shots. Take a time out, walk away, go home, and think on how you want to handle the issue. God gave you that instinct for a reason.

{Photo courtesy of Erfurt University}

@realDonaldTrump A letter from parents of the vaccine injured

Dear Donald,

Remember this?

copyright-andrew-wakefield

So do we. Thank you for meeting with Vaxxed director Dr. Andrew Wakefield. He is the voice for so many of the vaccine injured.

But many parents on our side, both those who supported you in this presidential run and those who did not, are afraid that you’re going to go the way of Obama once you’re in the White House. They remember his campaign promises about the right to know if our food has been genetically modified, which dragged out for eight years and finally ended with him signing the Monsanto Protection Act while he and his family ate out of an organic garden— and he handed out federal appointments to any Big Ag honchos who complained about it.

They remember how one of his White House attorneys— autism dad Michael Strautmanis— rounded up autism parent activists in 2007 and promised them that this was going to be their President. Obama knew what happened to Strautmanis’ severely effected child and that he would put an end to the epidemic of vaccine induced autism.

And what happened? Obama promptly took $20 million of pharma money for his 2008 campaign and told everyone to go get their flu shot. Strautmanis hasn’t been heard from since.

We know you won’t do this, Donald. You are not President Obama.

We are here to help you stop the autism epidemic and I’ve taken the time to write out my wish list for your first term.

  1. Drain the swamp we call the CDC. Drain it of corruption, corporate influence, and public policies that fly in the face of health. Hell, drain it of all funding—you wouldn’t be the first to say it should be done. Nobody needs a billion dollars of Zika money in the United States. Nobody needs an ebola vaccine. The CDC has grown into a fear mongering monstrosity not worthy of having access to speak to the American people. Take vaccine safety away from the CDC and set up an independent agency to monitor it. If there is anyone who deserves to be grabbed by the private parts, it’s the CDC. At minimum, appoint a CDC Director who understands that health does not come from a needle and that food is medicine, and who is willing to build a national health foundation on giving access to truth.
  2. Get Dr. Ben Carson to man up about autism if you’re going to nominate him as Secretary of Health and Human Services. This so-called “lack of evidence that vaccines cause autism” is really a lack of investigation into vaccines causing autism and we all know it. Hold his hand and let him know that it’s OK to admit that in some children, vaccines do cause autism, and together you’re going to turn this tide. Tell him to sell his pharma stock first. He alreadys knows the schedule is dangerous, with his public references to “too many, too soon” and wanting to stick to the “core vaccines.” But if Dr. Carson is going to have the job of caring about human conditions then he needs to care deeply about the condition of the voiceless who have been robbed of the life they deserved. Don, Bobby Jindal is an unacceptable choice for HHS. Give him a job that gets him away from vaccines.
  3. Nominate a US Surgeon General who understands that autism is an illness and not a mental disorder so that we don’t get some bullshit patronizing response to a vaccine petition that gathered 132,000 signatures like this one. If it’s the Surgeon General’s job to care about public health then they need to care about the bowel disease, immune system devastation, and seizure disorders brought on by the current vaccination schedule. We can’t make America great again with 1 in 30 boys on the spectrum and 1 in 6 kids being chronically ill.
  4. Publicly acknowledge the CDC Whistleblower investigation. We know you know all about this, but most of America does not. I don’t know if anything will ever come from the CDC investigation, given that their actions are 16 years old by now, but the public deserves to hear that a CDC scientist regretted his actions and that of his team in covering up the MMR-autism connection. And they deserve to hear it from the President of the United States.
  5. Dilute the CDC vaccination schedule back to one that is reasonable. While states are responsible for setting their own vaccination requirements for school, states wouldn’t add doses of a vaccine that’s not on the CDC schedule. Make personal referrals for Dr. Carson when it’s time for him to staff the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to shake that schedule up. Send him experts who realize that one cannot keep a child’s body in a constant state of inflammation and low level infection without serious consequences. Make it clear that no more vaccines are to be added, period. The infant doses of hepatitis b should be removed entirely and required only when the mother is hep b positive. Remove the polio vaccine since the disease is eradicated in nearly every country of the world. Remove the chicken pox vaccine for being entirely unnecessary. Delay the MMR vaccine until four years old and demand that single doses replace the three-in-one again. Expose the flu vaccine for the hoax that it is. Don’t allow children to receive more than one vaccine at a doctor appointment, and get rid of five-in-one vaccines. Set fire to Gardasil and let us enjoy watching it burn to the ground. Immediately halt the practice of recommending vaccination of pregnant women for flu and pertussis. Ban recommending acetaminophen for pregnant women and infants. Forbid the CDC from uttering the phrase “herd immunity” during your presidency.  Consult with Paul Thomas (buy his new book in that link) on what the new schedule should look like since he has eliminated new cases of autism from his medical practice with simple changes to the vaccination schedule. In fact, go ahead and tell Ben Carson to add Dr. Paul Thomas, Dr. Bob Sears and Dr. Rachael Ross to the ACIP.
  6. Make your personal stance against vaccine mandates known, and that there will never be a federal mandate on your watch. We all know this is lurking. We’ve got this Florida Representative’s nut job mandatory vaccination bill that was submitted last year and this inconceivable Executive Order to keep the world free of disease that Obama signed last week. Repeal that immediately, please. Send a message to the states, to the people, to the lobbyists, the legislators: state mandates go against the wishes of the highest office in the country.
  7. Work toward legislation to ban pharmaceutical campaign donations to Congressmen. Recognize pharmaceutical companies as the domestic terrorists that they are. They should not be able to give direct donations, not PAC donations, not any donations. The pharma lobby must die. We know that you cannot be bought, but you are not a one-man army. Our leaders are owned and it is an embarrassment to our nation.  Pharmaceutical companies not only have a direct hand in the vaccines added to the CDC schedule, but they are responsible for the epidemic of children on antipsychotic drugs, anti-depressant drugs, attention deficit drugs, pre-diabetic drugs, and now, cholesterol reducing drugs. We can’t move forward as a nation with pharmaceutical companies debilitating our children.
  8. Create an Autism Prevention Program. Vaccine induced autism is preventable. There is no one single path to autism, but the superhighway is the vaccination program. Force the CDC—if it will still exist—to get honest about autism prevention. Honest about SIDS prevention. Honest about anaphylactic food allergy prevention. Honest about juvenile diabetes prevention. They all stem from the same place. No reasonable person from the vaccine education crowd expects or asks you to ban all vaccines, but most vaccine injuries are avoidable on a lengthier and more diluted childhood schedule.
  9. See that we amend the National Vaccine Compensation Program. This will have to be done after you’ve kicked pharma out of campaign finance because performing surgery on this legislation is a can of worms you don’t want to open as long as pharma lobbyists are able to slip in poison pills to make the program worse than it already is. Years-long cases, an adversarial environment, a limited table of injuries, a short statute of limitations, a battle of the expert witnesses, a pathetically small number of cases being compensated— was never the intention of the legislation drafters. It is an abomination and a nightmare for the parents of the injured and the dead.
  10. Pardon Julian Assange and Edward Snowden. This world needs more government and corporate whistleblowers, and nobody knows that like them. They are not traitors. The world is a better place because of the information they’ve shared. Make America a safe place for the truth tellers to shine the light into the darkness of corruption.

You now have the unexpected gift of two years to do practically whatever you want with a Republican Congress, and they are not going to stop you from protecting our children once their pharma funding is gone.

But what if these changes impact your chances of reelection? Who cares? Come in, kick ass, then go back home to New York City having changed America for decades to come.

Thanks for listening.

Levi

The Donald Trump Meeting

donald_trump_president_cartoon

In the last few days of August, Dr. Andy Wakefield stood before a room of people and hinted about a meeting he’d recently attended.

Wrapping up his speech he warned the crowd, “This is a one issue election: the future of this country’s children. Use your vote extremely carefully. There is one person—whatever else you may think about him—who has expressed that he knows that vaccines cause autism and that vaccine damage is real. He would never allow mandatory vaccination. I had the privilege of meeting with him to discuss this precise issue. He is on our side. We will not get a second chance. Within two years of Hillary Clinton getting in, there will be mandatory adult and childhood vaccination across the entire country.”

By that time it had been a year since Donald Trump stood on a stage with Dr. Ben Carson and Dr. Rand Paul and the pro-vaccine moderator, Jake Tapper, asked, “Should Trump stop saying that vaccines cause autism?” in a live television attempt to turn Carson against Trump.

Instead, Trump jumped in and said that the autism epidemic is out of control, and that he is in favor of smaller doses of vaccines over a longer period of time. He said that he knew of a two and a half year old child who was vaccinated, developed a high fever, and became very sick and autistic.

Then Dr. Carson backed him up by saying, “It’s true that we are probably giving way too many in too short a period of time,” and Dr. Paul chimed in that he was also concerned about the vaccine schedule.

That backfire launched a week-long pharmaceutical-funded media attack on Republicans as being ignorant anti-science ninnies unqualified to have an opinion—despite two of them being medical doctors. But in typical fashion, because Trump didn’t continue to raise the vaccine issue at every tour stop, people on our side began to say that he didn’t care, that he’d walked back his statements, or that autism wasn’t even on his radar anymore.

I want to share a few things with you about Andrew Wakefield’s meeting with Donald Trump. Maybe I should have written this a long time ago, but I didn’t ask permission to write it from the people involved before yesterday because I know what it’s like to be given an opportunity conditioned on keeping things said off the record.

The team that visited Trump last summer says that he is very consistent in his position on vaccines. He has certainly not abandoned us. They specifically talked with him about vaccine-induced autism and they report that Trump undoubtedly knows that vaccines can and do cause autism.

Trump asked the type of questions that show the depth of his knowledge of the subject, such as how the current schedule came into being and how he can change it. He is already up to speed on what is happening. He already understands the issue.

{Don’t forget, this is a man who tweeted The Thinking Moms Revolution asking Jake Tapper and Sharyl Attkisson to report on the CDC Whistleblower two years ago.}

trump-tweet

One of the team members pointed out that “America can’t be great again” if this is the direction we are headed with our children and it visibly impacted Trump.

The most important promise came at the end of their meeting when someone said, “Donald, you are the only one who can fix this.”

And Trump said, “I will.”

He will fix this.

Fixing this is not rocket science. Hell, it’s not even vaccine science. He will fix this. It is entirely fixable, and he appreciates our advocates lending their assistance in getting it done.

Now, before you accuse him of pandering, ask yourself what he would have to gain from pandering to the 1% of Americans who don’t vaccinate at all.

Friends, we have a direct route to stopping this madness. Can you imagine that for a second? Can you just imagine having vaccine education advocates getting face-time with the person who appoints the director of the CDC?

Read that again: the President of the United States appoints the director of the CDC.

{And despite what our loose-lipped lady law professor in California has to say about it, there is no Senate confirmation for the CDC director. Good thing she teaches young minds administrative law. Never trust a lawyer who can’t get a license to practice law.}

Trump asked for a follow-up with our side. They are giving him advice on how to help us.

Contrast that with Hillary’s autism action plan that failed to mention one word about autism’s cause or how to prevent it. Contrast that with her adviser who forbade her from mentioning “autism’s cause” in a speech, and who suggested she rephrase with how “autistic children’s brains develop” so that we don’t pretend for one moment that autism is environmental and preventable.

When I read that email I felt like autism parents are drowning right in front of Hillary, but by refusing to say the word “cause” any longer, she yanked the life preserver out of the water and turned her back on them.

Andy Wakefield gave him a copy of Vaxxed and Trump promised that he’d watch it right away.

We already know that Donald Trump doesn’t care for pharmaceutical companies or Monsanto. And we know that the Clintons came into the White House in 1992 with a net worth of $300,000, left the office in 2000 with more liabilities than assets, but have commanded $230 million in the past 16 years from selling nothing but their political influence to pharmaceutical companies, chemical companies, Wall Street banks, and Middle Eastern kingdoms.

Kudos to their success, but the Clintons are owned.  There is no denying that. Their lifestyle is funded in large part by the companies who profit off destroying our children.

Trump’s position on healthcare is that every American deserves access to high quality, affordable care, and not just insurance. He has said that Obamacare has failed on cost and quality. Few people would disagree with those statements on either side of the political fence. But I can understand if you disagree with Trump on immigration, accepting refugees, global warming, or whether or not Islam is a religion for many with a propensity for violence. I get that he’s said many shitty things about women with no regard for who was listening.

But Trump’s faults don’t equate with Hillary having a halo– entire books have been written by her former secret servicemen about what an intolerable human being she is. She gave a speech where she defended fracking and said that environmental activists need to get a life. Her own advisers would rather create a “progressive Islam” because even ignoring the violence of Islam’s current incarnation, they feel that the domination of women and the hate for gays, Jews and Christians just isn’t working out for the Democratic party. I’m not so sure there is much of a difference in many of the policies of America’s two-party system.

I personally know numerous people still enamored with Bill Clinton (no judgment here) despite his penchant for “dicking bimbos at home” (Colin Powell’s words, not mine), and they either refuse to vote for Hillary, or they’re doing it begrudgingly.

But the parent of a vaccine injured child has no business putting the nail in the coffin of generations to come.

If Hillary takes office we would have to find a way to pay the Clintons more than all of the pharmaceutical companies combined because Hillary is not — not publicly and not privately– concerned about stopping vaccine-induced autism in this country. No one has paid her to care.

But Donald Trump already cares, and Donald Trump cannot be bought.